中美贸易战

Why China should agree a European trade deal

“Large multinational corporation signs agreement to invest billions of dollars in China petrochemical plant.” Yawn. It is not nearly as exciting as a trade war between the world’s two largest economies.

That is why a July 9 agreement concerning a $10bn investment by German chemicals giant BASF in a wholly owned facility in southern China received almost no press coverage, especially compared with the opening shot of US president Donald Trump’s trade war with China three days earlier. 

The two events are, however, closely linked and reveal much about Beijing’s penny-wise, pound-foolish approach to market access reforms over recent years. Chinese companies have profited enormously when foreign investors have been forced to operate through joint-venture structures, but China would have benefited much more if such requirements had been eliminated a long time ago. 

您已阅读19%(870字),剩余81%(3628字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×