观点社交媒体

Twitter/X: maverick rebrand leaves Musk with a cross to bear

Replacing one’s brand risks annoying and confusing customers, and the direct financial cost can be high

There are few better ways to signal corporate distress than a rebrand. Last year, Elon Musk spent $44bn buying Twitter, a midsized social media company. Jettisoning its globally recognised brand does nothing to address the lossmaking company’s problems. But as new names go, X is better than most. It is short, arresting and unmistakable.

Name pivots are common across early stage US tech companies. Amazon began life as Cadabra, Snapchat started out as Picaboo and Instagram’s prototype was called Burbn. Twitter, which was born out of a company called Odeo, was once spelled Twttr.

But rebrands in later corporate life are different. From tobacco seller Philip Morris to Facebook, they tend to highlight problems they are designed to cover. They risk annoying and confusing customers. The direct financial cost, including domain name purchases, can be high.

您已阅读35%(857字),剩余65%(1618字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×