FT商学院

Something for the weekend: the economics of Eurovision

Plus our favourite articles, podcasts and video this week
This weekend, Liverpool will host the 67th annual Eurovision Song Contest on behalf of last year’s winner, Ukraine. While tens of millions of people around the world are expected to watch and the event draws tourists from far and wide, the strange truth is that previous host cities have struggled to make money from it. We asked Daniel Thomas, the FT’s chief UK business correspondent, for his take on the economics of Eurovision.

On Saturday night, I will be in a vast arena on the waterfront in Liverpool to watch 26 acts from around Europe (and Australia) at the Eurovision Song Contest. The contest launched the career of Abba, Céline Dion and, most recently, Måneskin. It is an event that has grown in size and stature to now attract an audience of 160mn worldwide.

Despite this, it is often reported that some cities have struggled to make money from hosting the event, which is funded via a mixture of cash from the city, local and international broadcasters, sponsors, ticket sales and the national government. So I wanted to see if the financial implications of hosting Eurovision were true.

While Sweden will be hopeful of securing a seventh victory on Saturday night with a banging Europop anthem, British ministers and city officials are confident that the event will also be a financial success for the UK.

您已阅读22%(1318字),剩余78%(4786字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×