FT商学院

‘Open science’ advocates warn of widespread academic fraud

Scandals at Stanford and Harvard show manipulation of research remains an issue despite growth of ‘data detectives’

A decade since Brian Nosek launched an initiative to tackle academic fraud, efforts to impose greater accountability in research have in the past few weeks claimed two of their most high-profile scalps.

Marc Tessier-Lavigne, a distinguished neuroscientist and president of Stanford, resigned and pledged to retract a series of papers in prestigious journals after an independent inquiry concluded they used manipulated data. Harvard has similarly demanded retractions of papers co-written by professor Francesca Gino, a leading dishonesty expert in its business school who is currently on administrative leave.

“There is a culture of greater transparency,” said Nosek, a professor at the University of Virginia and co-founder of the Center for Open Science. “The observation of fraud is certainly increasing, but we don’t know the denominator.”

您已阅读15%(842字),剩余85%(4668字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×