FT商学院

Ukraine will have a just peace or no peace at all
乌克兰要么得到公正的和平,要么根本就没有和平

Kyiv’s allies must still put it in a stronger position for any settlement talks
基辅的盟友仍然必须让它在任何和解谈判中处于更有利的地位。

The prospect of Donald Trump’s return to the White House and his nomination of JD Vance, a hardline isolationist, as his running mate have raised the difficult question of what price is it worth paying to bring peace to Ukraine. Trump has boasted, ludicrously, that he could end Vladimir Putin’s brutal war of aggression against Ukraine overnight, without explaining how. Former Trump advisers have sketched out flimsy plans for a ceasefire in return for territorial concessions. Hungarian premier Viktor Orbán, Europe’s appeaser in chief, went on a self-appointed “peace mission” to Kyiv, the Kremlin and Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s Florida redoubt.

唐纳德•特朗普(Donald Trump)重返白宫的前景以及他提名的强硬孤立主义者JD•万斯(JD Vance)作为竞选搭档,引发了一个棘手的问题:为了给乌克兰带来和平,值得付出什么代价?特朗普荒谬地吹嘘自己可以在一夜之间结束弗拉基米尔•普京(Vladimir Putin)对乌克兰的残酷侵略战争,却没有解释如何做到。前特朗普顾问们勾勒出了以领土让步换取停火的脆弱计划。匈牙利总理维克托•欧尔班(Viktor Orbán),作为欧洲的首席绥靖者,自封为“和平使者”,前往基辅、克里姆林宫和特朗普在佛罗里达的海湖庄园。

您已阅读18%(900字),剩余82%(4190字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×