观点自然资源

Copper tariffs are the wrong answer to the right question

Trade levies could solve the supply-demand problem but they are a blunt tool

Uncle Sam has a copper problem. In very round numbers, the US produces 1mn tonnes of the red metal, and consumes 2mn. The deficit is filled from overseas, creating a potential geopolitical vulnerability. Yet even within the US, there’s ample copper to go round, for those brave, rich and patient enough to extract it — especially if cheaper imports suddenly lose their allure. A case, then, for tariffs.

That, at least, is the logic from the White House. President Donald Trump has pledged to slap levies on imports of copper, having already identified the metal as a critical input for American prosperity. That drove the price of copper futures on US markets up by almost a fifth on Tuesday. Of course, a mooted blanket 50 per cent tariff is unlikely to be the final result. Now come the negotiations and capitulations.

There is a legitimate problem to be solved. Copper, while abundant, is increasingly expensive and hard to extract. For years, it has been apparent that a supply crunch looms, with natural growth in demand amplified by the transition to green energy and “electrification”. For example, an electric vehicle uses 2.5 times as much copper as a petrol guzzler, estimates S&P Global.

您已阅读40%(1197字),剩余60%(1796字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×