观点并购

Billion-dollar ‘acqui-hires’ are bad for competition

From Google to Microsoft to Meta, some of the biggest tech deals of the past few years have been staff moves

The writer is the former assistant attorney-general for antitrust at the US Department of Justice

When Google agreed a $2.4bn deal for AI programming tool start-up Windsurf last month, the fine print may have slipped past many observers: Google wasn’t paying for the company — it was hiring its leaders.

This sort of transaction is known as a “reverse acqui-hire” (often shortened to acqui-hire). Distinct from a traditional acquisition, they occur when larger companies pay for a smaller company’s talent — leaving behind its product, customers, and corporate shell. In this case Windsurf’s chief executive, Varun Mohan and co-founder Douglas Chen, along with several R&D employees, were hired to join Google’s AI division. Google also paid to license Windsurf technology.

您已阅读17%(771字),剩余83%(3812字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×