FT商学院

Does the K-shaped economy theory even make sense?

Plus, more on memory stocks

This article is an on-site version of our Unhedged newsletter. Premium subscribers can sign up here to get the newsletter delivered every weekday. Standard subscribers can upgrade to Premium here, or explore all FT newsletters

Good morning. The very last American penny was minted yesterday. Its fatal sin: costing nearly 4 cents to make. Absence may make the (consumer’s) heart grow fonder, though. Businesses will eventually have to round up prices to the nearest nickel, which the Richmond Fed estimates could cost shoppers about $6mn per year. Penny for your thoughts: unhedged@ft.com.

K-shaped logic

Yesterday we argued that all the talk about a K-shaped economy had been overdone. America is very unequal in wealth and income. But there just isn’t much evidence to suggest that there has been a recent increase in inequality big enough to explain the stratification of consumer behaviour — the well-to-do spending merrily as the working class scrapes by — that companies have reported. Explaining other odd discontinuities in the economic picture (such as high GDP growth combined with low job creation) by reference to inequality doesn’t fit the evidence, either. 

您已阅读19%(1169字),剩余81%(5060字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×