观点人工智能

We need to learn how to argue with AI

Putting humans in the loop is pointless if they simply rubber-stamp authoritative-sounding information

The writer is a theoretical neuroscientist and author of ‘Robot-Proof’

Generative AI is, by design, a machine for producing the feeling of competence without the substance of it. To see what sort of impact this is having on our ability to think, I asked a classroom of students to wear EEG headsets while they worked on the same assignment with the same AI agent. From the front of the room they looked indistinguishable: heads down, screens glowing, fingers tapping. Inside their skulls, however, two very different stories were unfolding.

In most of the students, the EEG measuring their brain activity revealed that the high-frequency “gamma” oscillations that mark cognitive effort collapsed within minutes of using the AI agent. Their neural state drifted towards something closer to watching TV than solving maths problems.

您已阅读18%(827字),剩余82%(3801字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×