FT商学院

Why countries should restructure debts sooner rather than later

Delays lead to harder knock-on effects from a restructuring of borrowings
The writer isportfolio manager at Sampension and a visiting fellow at the London School of Economics.

Despite a recovery in the global economy from the pandemic, many developing countries are approaching a default on their debts. The lessons from history is that they should not delay a decision to default for too long.

The reasons why countries postpone a decision are understandable. Finance ministers fear for their jobs, bankers and lawyers talk about lost credibility, and surely markets will not forget the next time a country wants to borrow money. At least that seems to be conventional wisdom.

The cost of a sovereign default can be significant, but depends crucially on how and why it occurs. In a “hard” (or unilateral) debt default, where the country is unwilling or unable to pay, economic growth can, and often does, deteriorate. The risk of knock-on effects from the currency or banking system in these situations is high.

您已阅读21%(936字),剩余79%(3602字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×