FT商学院

A regulatory shake-up that would give central banks too much power

Proposal on capital rules could mean investors end up outsourcing their investment decision to the regulator
The writer is afounding partner of Veritum Partners

The life of an analyst of bank stocks is not for everyone. Much of the day is spent wading through regulatory minutiae, maintaining bloated spreadsheets and hacking through a thicket of acronyms such as CCBs, CCyBs, G-SIB, ATI, Pillar 2 etc.

A recent speech by a senior UK regulator has proposed making things simpler, perhaps too simple though. Sam Woods, deputy governor for prudential regulation at the Bank of England and chief executive of the Prudential Regulation Authority, laid out a vision of a new system of regulation for bank capital.

On the face of it, this sounds like an excellent idea, but it could actually have worrisome repercussions, further extending the arguably outsized power of central banks in markets.

您已阅读17%(778字),剩余83%(3710字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×