观点创新manbetx20客户端下载

Generative AI should pay human artists for training

Painters and singers need legal protection from the revolution in algorithmic creativity

A flat above a fried chicken shop in Notting Hill is an odd place to be at the heart of what has been called “one of the most important legal questions” of the 21st century. It is the registered office of Stability AI, an artificial intelligence group that is upsetting artists around the world.

Stability AI is run by Emad Mostaque, a computer scientist and former hedge fund employee. It operates the image-generating software Stable Diffusion, described in a US lawsuit as “a 21st-cen­tury col­lage tool that remixes the copy­righted works of mil­lions”. Type in “Elon Musk in a Van Gogh painting” and it produces an amusing pastiche.

The three women artists behind the US lawsuit have backing. Getty Images, the stock photo group with 135mn copyrighted images on its database, last week started another legal action against Stability AI in the UK courts. Getty’s images, along with millions of others, are used to train Stable Diffusion so it can perform its tricks.

您已阅读19%(968字),剩余81%(4042字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×