高盛

Goldman in China

Four things come not back: the spoken word, the sped arrow, the past life and the neglected opportunity. Foreign banks should heed this Chinese proverb before hastily exiting its country of origin. So far, Royal Bank of Scotland, Bank of America and UBS, among others, have reduced their stakes in China's biggest lenders. This week, Goldman Sachs denied rumours it was selling its holding in Industrial & Commercial Bank of China.

Sure, the silver has to go if there is no choice. But for banks such as Goldman that do not need the capital, leaving China would be a huge strategic error. That is because the global balance of demand for financial services is shifting east. Western countries are over-banked and households must begin an extremely long and painful process of deleveraging.

China, on the other hand, is in completely the opposite situation, with wealth per capita just now reaching levels where financial assets begin to shift from cash deposits to more sophisticated banking products. What is more, the Chinese authorities understand that private sector investment – via asset managers and insurers, for example – must play a bigger economic role versus intermediation by the state.

您已阅读65%(1197字),剩余35%(632字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×