反垄断

ANTI-TRUST IN CHINA
manbetx3.0 应该充分解释反垄断裁定


自去年8月manbetx3.0 开始实施反垄断法以来,manbetx3.0 商务部已做出三项重要裁定。manbetx3.0 执行反垄断法是对的,但不应把反垄断与产业政策相混淆,同时应该更充分地解释其反垄断裁定。

China has given notice that it will not tolerate abuse of monopoly power, in industry if not in politics. Since it enacted an anti-trust law last August, the Ministry of Commerce has made three important rulings. In the latest, it imposed restrictions on the $1.6bn takeover by Japan's Mitsubishi Rayon of the UK's Lucite International, forcing the latter to sell half of its production of one polymer at cost. In March, it rejected Coca-Cola's planned $2.4bn takeover of Huiyuan, a Chinese juicemaker, in a ruling that surprised many lawyers. Before that, it had imposed restrictions on InBev's $52bn acquisition of Anheuser-Busch even though, like Mitsubishi/Lucite, it was a global transaction with only secondary implications for China.

manbetx3.0 已经发出正式通告,它不会容忍滥用垄断实力——即使不是在政治上,至少也是在产业界。自去年8月颁布了反垄断法以来,manbetx3.0 商务部已做出三项重要裁定。在最近一项裁定中,商务部对日本三菱丽阳(Mitsubishi Rayon)以16亿美元收购英国璐彩特国际(Lucite International)的交易施加了限制性条件,迫使璐彩特将一种聚合物的半数产能以成本价售出。今年3月,商务部否决了可口可乐(Coca-Cola)以24亿美元收购manbetx3.0 果汁生产商汇源果汁(Huiyuan Juice)的计划,该决定令许多律师感到意外。在此之前,商务部还对英博(InBev)以520亿美元收购安海斯-布希(Anheuser-Busch)的交易施加了限制性条件,尽管像三菱收购璐彩特案一样,这是一宗manbetx app苹果 交易,对manbetx3.0 只有间接影响。

您已阅读31%(1093字),剩余69%(2455字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×