观点力拓

BHP / Rio joint venture
Lex专栏:“两拓”合资是不是垄断?


若manbetx3.0 监管当局依据去年通过的《反垄断法》行事,就应对两拓交易袖手旁观。但鉴于此笔交易涉及manbetx3.0 75%的铁矿石进口供给,商务部必须谨慎行事。

It is ironic that a one-party state should embrace an anti-monopoly law. But since last August China has had one, and is not afraid to use it. So how worried should Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton be by comments from a presumably well-connected official that their proposed tie-up has “strong monopolistic flavours?”

一个一党制国家施行《反垄断法》,是件颇具讽刺意味的事情。但自去年8月起,manbetx3.0 就出台了这样一部法律,且不惮实施。那么,对于一名想必人脉颇广的manbetx3.0 官员有关两拓拟议中的结盟带有“明显的垄断色彩”的评论,力拓(Rio Tinto)和必和必拓(BHP Billiton)应该担心到何种程度呢?

您已阅读17%(452字),剩余83%(2190字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×