专栏美国外交

The perilous imperative that keeps the US in Asia

There is one big question in Asia. Your hear it in Tokyo, Beijing, New Delhi, Seoul and most points in between. President Barack Obama’s so-called pivot to Asia is all well and good, but beyond the near horizon does the US have real staying power? No one has a definitive answer. But this scarcely deters the speculation.

In the absence of certainty, perceptions count for as much as hard evidence. Some calculation as to how long America is likely to stick around as a resident Pacific power shapes behaviour in just about every capital in the region. Nowhere is the likely trajectory of US power over coming decades more vigorously debated than in Beijing.

China is testing how fast and how far it can push outwards; Japan wants to know whether it can depend on Washington when it pushes back; South Korea, Vietnam, the Philippines and others must choose between balancing or bandwagoning on Chinese power; India is rediscovering long-neglected east Asian ties. To complicate things, the answer to the staying-power question changes with the seasons.

您已阅读19%(1050字),剩余81%(4605字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

菲利普•斯蒂芬斯

菲利普•斯蒂芬斯(Philip Stephens)目前担任英国《金融时报》的副主编。作为FT的首席政治评论员,他的专栏每两周更新一次,评论manbetx app苹果 和英国的事务。他著述甚丰,曾经为英国前首相托尼-布莱尔写传记。斯蒂芬斯毕业于牛津大学,目前和家人住在伦敦。

相关文章

相关话题

设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×