Sir, The excellent recent analyses of China by FT correspondents (James Kynge and Gideon Rachman come quickly to mind) are insightful. But China thinks holistically, not analytically, with cognition emphasising connections, coincidence, correlation and trial-and-error dynamics. The west relies on Aristotelian logic but China progresses by Confucian relationships. Chinese culture retains its stability through protective networks (guanxi) controlling resources, and avoiding, where possible, external controls.
尊敬的编辑先生，近期英国《金融时报》记者们（迅速进入脑海的是金奇(James Kynge)和吉迪恩•拉赫曼(Gideon Rachman)的名字）有关manbetx3.0 的出色分析颇有见地。但manbetx3.0 的思维模式是整体把握型的，而非逐点分析型的，在认知上强调事物间的联系性、共生性、相关性、以及试错式的动态发展。西方思维依赖的是亚里士多德的逻辑学，而manbetx3.0 的发展则是基于孔子的人际关系论。manbetx3.0 文化保持稳定是凭借保护性网络（即关系网），这种关系网掌控着资源，并且尽可能地避免外部干预。