观点反恐

Why breaking encryption to combat terrorism carries risks

Many things in life are desirable but unachievable. Personally, I would love to play chess as well as Magnus Carlsen but I somehow doubt that is going to happen.

It is a similar story with politicians demanding “exceptional access” to private encrypted communications. It is perfectly understandable why security services desire such powers. In the wake of the murderous attacks in Manchester and London, who would not want to tap the electronic traffic of terrorist suspects?

But governments should be extraordinarily careful before forcing technology companies to comply. At worst, their demand may be unattainable in the messiness of the real world; at best, it could result in enormous cost and complexity. The unintended consequences of such action could also be appalling. Mandating insecurity in technological systems, which run so much of the critical infrastructure of the modern world, is inherently a bad idea.

您已阅读21%(919字),剩余79%(3413字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×