专栏欧洲

Europe’s unpleasant choice between Trump and Xi

The task of Whitehall’s National Security Council is to map the threats facing Britain. It has plenty of material to work with: Islamist terrorism, Russian revanchism, the Middle East in flames, rising nationalism, nuclear proliferation and Chinese cyber attacks among them. The other day, though, the council’s senior min-isters and policymakers took a different tack. What if the biggest danger turned out to be hiding in plain sight?

The question posed — and, as I understand it, not fully answered — at this particular meeting was whether the strategic challenge lay not so much in the intentions of known adversaries, but in those of Britain’s most vital ally. For 70 years the cherished special relationship with Washington has been a pillar of British foreign policy. But for how much longer will the US be a dependable ally?

Reading the latest headlines you can see why Theresa May’s government might have doubts. The prime minister is fighting for her political life to win parliamentary support for the Brexit deal she has struck with the EU27. US president Donald Trump’s response to her predicament was the casually wounding judgment that Brussels seemed to have called all the shots and may well have thwarted a bilateral trade accord between Britain and the US. With friends like that . . .

您已阅读24%(1302字),剩余76%(4057字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

菲利普•斯蒂芬斯

菲利普•斯蒂芬斯(Philip Stephens)目前担任英国《金融时报》的副主编。作为FT的首席政治评论员,他的专栏每两周更新一次,评论manbetx app苹果 和英国的事务。他著述甚丰,曾经为英国前首相托尼-布莱尔写传记。斯蒂芬斯毕业于牛津大学,目前和家人住在伦敦。

相关文章

相关话题

设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×