专栏美联储

Do not underestimate Jay Powell in a fight with Donald Trump

Economists from Duke University and London Business School recently published research into a once-unthinkable — but now timely — question: how much market impact does a presidential Twitter attack on the US Federal Reserve actually have?

The answer offers reasons for hope — and fear. On the upbeat side, the tangible market impact of Donald Trump’s demands for looser monetary policy have been modest so far, the research suggests; the implied yield on Fed Funds futures contracts apparently declined by an average of 0.30 basis points after each attack, producing “the cumulative effect of around negative 10 bps” so far. This is so small in the wider scheme of things that it would undoubtedly disappoint Mr Trump in the (unlikely) event he read this research.

What is less cheering is that the fact futures prices moved at all after Mr Trump’s tweets suggests that “markets do not perceive the Federal Reserve Bank as a fully independent institution immune from political pressure”, the economists argue. There is, in other words, already some implied damage.

您已阅读23%(1062字),剩余77%(3542字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

吉莲•邰蒂

吉莲•邰蒂(Gillian Tett)担任英国《金融时报》的助理主编,负责manbetx app苹果 金融市场的报导。2009年3月,她荣获英国出版业年度记者。她1993年加入FT,曾经被派往前苏联和欧洲地区工作。1997年,她担任FT东京分社社长。2003年,她回到伦敦,成为Lex专栏的副主编。邰蒂在剑桥大学获得社会人文学博士学位。她会讲法语、俄语、日语和波斯语。

相关文章

相关话题

设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×