观点人工智能

AI-driven justice may be better than none at all
人工智能司法:不完美,但比没有好

Some fear automation reinforces bias and dehumanises, but ‘robot judges’ can also tackle backlogs
凯莉:虽然人工智能驱动的判决相比人类法官判决有诸多缺点,但它可以让人们更容易使用法律程序并解决案件积压。

A few years ago I was hauled up in front of three magistrates in a south London courthouse, the culmination of a months-long bureaucratic nightmare that landed me with a criminal conviction for being unable to prove I had paid a £1.50 bus fare when my phone ran out of battery. After nervously recounting my tangled tale of woe, I was vindicated: I was told my conviction would be withdrawn. “I bet you’re very relieved,” the presiding justice said to me with a sympathetic smile. I was indeed.

几年前,在伦敦南部一家法院,我被传讯到三名地方法官面前,此前长达数月的官僚噩梦在这时达到了高潮——在那场官僚噩梦中,我被判有罪,因为我无法证明自己在手机没电时支付了1.5英镑的公交车费。

您已阅读9%(587字),剩余91%(5664字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×