观点新型冠状病毒

How (not) to do science in a crisis

It is a way of thinking that is open to the curious, not a boxful of unchanging truths only for the initiated

The writer is a science commentator Who needs Succession when the UK Covid inquiry is on YouTube? The real-life rollercoaster drama, which began public hearings in June, has been lifting the veil on how decisions were made in the UK during the pandemic.

The storyline, shaped in recent weeks by the testimony of civil servants and scientific advisers, veers between the farcical and the macabre. At the centre of the decision-making web lay an indecisive and “bamboozled” prime minister who struggled with numbers, according to diaries kept by his chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance. 

Surrounding him, one female civil servant testified, were ego-driven misogynists with a collective “absence of humanity”. These accomplices included a health secretary keen to decide which citizens would live or die; and a chancellor nicknamed Dr Death for his resistance to infection-curbing measures. In a twist that Succession creator Jesse Armstrong might applaud, Dr Death, aka Rishi Sunak, is now prime minister, and Dame Angela McLean, the scientist who coined the nickname, is his chief scientific adviser.  

您已阅读24%(1110字),剩余76%(3490字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×