观点出口管制

Why export controls are failing to cripple their targets
出口管制为何伤害性不大?

Diverse geopolitics, smart researchers and resourceful traders are undermining attempts to control critical products
贝蒂:错综复杂的地缘政治局势、聪明的研发人员和善于变通的贸易商,这些都在削弱将贸易武器化的效果。

The long-predicted weaponisation of trade has, it seems, finally arrived. The US-China rivalry and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have politicised commerce to an extent not seen since the cold war. It’s not just that governments are increasingly blocking geopolitical rivals’ access to militarily sensitive technology. The big trading powers have also restricted exports of vital materials and tried to prevent adversaries selling their own commodities abroad.  But just because governments are keen on export curbs and trade sanctions doesn’t mean they work. Beijing’s imposition of controls on critical minerals, the US-led G7 club of rich countries’ sanctions on Russian oil, Russia’s own attempted coercion of western Europe by cutting off gas supply: all have caused alarm, but none has yet succeeded in crippling its target. Governments cannot muster enough control over global demand to choke off trade, supply chains are agile, sometimes illicitly so, and end users have found alternatives.

早在意料之中的“贸易武器化”似乎终于到来了。美中对抗和俄罗斯入侵乌克兰,使商业的政治化达到了冷战以来从未见过的程度。不仅各国政府越来越多地阻止地缘政治对手获得军事敏感技术,贸易大国还限制关键材料的出口,并试图阻止对手出口他们自己的大宗商品。

您已阅读15%(1116字),剩余85%(6339字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×