观点英国政治

Why is the Starmer to Burnham transition so long?

Like St Augustine, the assumed new Labour leader appears to want to be prime minister — but not yet

The writer is a professor of politics at Queen Mary University of London

Everyone my age can remember where they were on November 22 1990, when Margaret Thatcher announced she would resign. I was a student, beavering away on an essay, when someone stuck their head around the door and shouted, “She’s gone!” before running off to spread the news more widely. Five days later, John Major topped the ballot of Conservative MPs. He became prime minister the following day, November 28.

Six days. By the standards of 20th century Britain, that was relatively long. In the preceding 90 years, the median length of time it took to change prime ministers midterm — from the announcement of the resignation of the incumbent to the new prime minister kissing hands at Buckingham Palace — was a single day. We don’t traditionally do long transitions. A defining image of British electoral politics is the removal van, parked up in Downing Street the day after a general election, ready to cart off the defeated prime minister’s belongings.

您已阅读22%(1027字),剩余78%(3748字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×