Web3与加密金融

The dark side of tokenisation

The financial industry needs to think of resilience as much as efficiency when putting real-world assets on to blockchains
BlackRock has chosen to host its tokenised Buidl fund on the public permissionless Ethereum blockchain
The writer is a law professor at the American University Washington College of Law

Traditional financial institutions are increasingly showing interest in “tokenising” real-world assets, meaning they are curious about how these assets could be digitally represented by programmable tokens recorded on shared ledgers. There could be real efficiency gains associated with tokenisation, but the drive towards it could also take a dark turn.

The most dangerous outcomes would arise if tokenisation of real-world assets were pursued simply to feed into what has been described as “the perpetual motion machine that is crypto trading”. Regulators around the world have expressed concerns about the integration of crypto and traditional financial markets, because of the high levels of volatility, leverage, concentration and operational risk associated with the crypto markets. This integration would be sped up if ownership of tokenised real-world assets were recorded on so-called permissionless public blockchains. The type of ledger favoured by the crypto industry, these blockchains can be accessed by any computer running the necessary software to host them, no identification or vetting required

您已阅读27%(1296字),剩余73%(3568字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
虚拟货币相关活动存在较大法律风险。请根据监管规范,注意甄别和远离非法金融活动,谨防个人财产和权益受损。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×