FT商学院

Compulsive tracking doesn’t measure what really counts

Centuries of the subtle craft of measurement have given way to gadgets that spew numbers

The writer is a systems engineer and author of ‘Wicked Problems: How to Engineer a Better World’

In 1525, Albrecht Dürer published Underweysung der Messung [A Manual of Measurement], a treatise that taught artisans how to measure and why it mattered. Today, numbers swarm unbidden from your phone — steps, likes, shares, scores — while the craft of measurement has atrophied.

Dürer wrote for working hands that lived by precision: painters, goldsmiths, stonemasons and carpenters. When a line ran a hair too long, it wasted silver; a misjudged angle doomed a joint. He offered a method, starting with straight lines and advancing through curves and spirals to perspective and lettering, culminating in solid polyhedra. The geometry descended from Euclid but Dürer helped organise it. Printed in vernacular German rather than Latin when the printing press was barely seventy years old, the treatise raced through workshops, making measurement portable, repeatable and, in the spirit of the Reformation, available to all.

您已阅读23%(1017字),剩余77%(3494字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×