FT商学院

The new Luddite movement

If governments don’t slow AI down, voters — like their predecessors — might take matters into their own hands

When Ned Ludd and his band of weavers took hammers to the new looms in early 19th-century England, mill owners retaliated by shooting them. I wonder how the tech titans will respond if voters switch from holding placards outside data centres to smashing them up. This seems likely, given the gulf between the pioneers’ excitement about what AI might offer, and the scams, slop and job losses which citizens currently see.

While some tech bosses talk inspirationally about scientific breakthroughs, other plutocrats breach copyright, stand by while their social media platforms harm mental health, demand more energy to power their ambitions with scant concern about climate change — and then boast with apparent glee about the eradication of white-collar jobs.

Yes, the west must try to win the AI race with China on national security. But if that contest simply enriches a few, at the expense of the many, voters could conclude that we might as well embrace communism.  

您已阅读18%(969字),剩余82%(4420字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×