FT商学院

Yes, peer review has problems. But Trump’s solution is dangerous

Replacing academic judgment with political alignment undermines the very engine of discovery

The writer is a professor at MIT and Politecnico di Milano, and founder of Carlo Ratti Associati

For once, I should thank the Trump administration. It has forced academia to confront a problem that has long needed attention: the shortcomings of peer review. The proposed cure, however, is far worse than the disease.

The modern American research system grew out of the vision of a single engineer from my own university, MIT. In 1945, Vannevar Bush proposed a grand three-way bargain: government would fund research; scientists with the relevant expertise would judge its merit; and society would reap the benefits. That arrangement gave us the modern American research university and the long chain of inventions that shape our lives today.

您已阅读19%(739字),剩余81%(3052字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×