FT商学院

Public servants/stock trading: disclosure regime has proven inadequate

A patchwork system encourages cynicism and erodes confidence in its leaders

Profiting from the revolving door between the public and private sectors may be old hat. Recent controversies have revealed American public servants have profited personally from trading of stocks and securities funds. The sense that elected representatives, central bankers or judges have perhaps used their privileged positions to enrich themselves will jar with an electorate rightly expecting better behaviour from these officials.

This week, Richard Clarida, the Federal Reserve’s vice-chair, said he would resign after a supplementary disclosure he recently filed revealed surprisingly active trading in mutual funds. These occurred just as the pandemic began in 2020, when the Fed was preparing its stimulus response. This comes as one US senator prepares legislation to prevent Congress members from trading individual stocks. Mandatory disclosures have shown that some politicians already actively buy and sell equities.

Policymakers have always had some influence over the fortunes of the economy as well as individual industries, or companies. But in the pandemic era when monetary and fiscal stimulus plans appeared to affect asset price behaviour more than any other factor, those charged with the public interest must guard against putting their own finances first.

您已阅读58%(1278字),剩余42%(941字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×