美国银行

Bank of America

A year is a long, long time in banking. Just 12 months after Bank of America received its first slug of government funds, the bank is repaying the Treasury's entire $45bn investment. That is good news for taxpayers, who have pocketed about $2.5bn in dividends to date, and are left with only one real mega-bank, Citigroup, as an ongoing concern. More perplexing, perhaps, is why shareholders, who marked BofA's shares up 3 per cent in after-hours trading, are so pleased.

Investors, presumably, see liberation from the heavy hand of government outweighing the mammoth capital raising that BofA requires to buy its freedom. In fact, the bank will not repurchase warrants granted to the Treasury as part of its investment. That means a wrangle over their valuation is still to come. But this $45bn repayment is the significant step that Ken Lewis, the outgoing chief executive, sought and, more important, will shake off the more onerous restrictions on compensation. That may make it easier for BofA to reap the strategic benefits of its messy tie-up with Merrill Lynch. It should also ease the process of finding a suitable candidate to take over from Mr Lewis.

Shareholders are being strong-armed into approving common stock issuance required to raise $18.8bn – “common equivalent securities” will be issued with dilutive penalties if they refuse. But the bank perhaps could have waited until stronger earnings gave it greater wherewithal to repay its debts. The need to bump up capital ratios means $4bn must also be found through asset sales, supervised by the Federal Reserve. Among the stress test banks, BofA has one of the highest percentages of realised to expected losses, according to Barclays Capital, with more undoubtedly still to come. With or without government money, banks remain a risky bet.

订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×