专栏银行家

WHY ‘TOO BIG TO FAIL' INSURANCE IS THE WORST OF ALL WORLDS

The main headline in Saturday's Financial Times was “Bankers in favour of paying global tax”. A more newsworthy headline than “man bites dog” and only a little behind “Pope not a Catholic”. The bankers quoted were Josef Ackerman of Deutsche Bank and Bob Diamond of Barclays; so you might suspect that there was both more, and less, to their enthusiasm than met the eye. You would be right.

Both gentlemen expressed support for a levy on banks to fund an international rescue fund for institutions deemed “too big to fail”. Implemented globally, such a plan would not change the competitive position of individual banks, although its universality raises the likelihood that the tax would be passed on to savers and borrowers. The fund would secure stability of the financial system while avoiding future burdens on taxpayers.

Perhaps. More likely, by institutionalising the concept of “too big to fail”, the scheme would aggravate the underlying problem of moral hazard. It would also transform state funding of the banking system from an exceptional response to a dire emergency into an expectation, even an entitlement.

您已阅读28%(1118字),剩余72%(2937字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

约翰•凯

约翰•凯(John Kay)从1995年开始为英国《金融时报》撰写manbetx20客户端下载 和商业的专栏。他曾经任教于伦敦商学院和牛津大学。目前他在伦敦manbetx20客户端下载 学院担任访问学者。他有着非常辉煌的从商经历,曾经创办和壮大了一家咨询公司,然后将其转售。约翰•凯著述甚丰,其中包括《企业成功的基础》(Foundations of Corporate Success, 1993)、《市场的真相》(The Truth about Markets, 2003)和近期的《金融投资指南》(The Long and the Short of It: finance and investment for normally intelligent people who are not in the industry)。

相关文章

相关话题

设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×