观点金融监管

The dangers of our new regulation
英国监管新政令人忧


渣打银行行政总裁冼博德:英国新设立的金融政策委员会的工作方法不但干涉倾向极强,而且思路极其狭隘。这和上世纪70年代英国对金融业准国有化的情况有些像。

Before the crisis, financial regulation focused on averting the failure of individual banks – and was not much good at that. Now there is much more focus on preventing systemic crises. In the jargon, we have moved from focusing on “microprudential regulation” to a much greater emphasis on “macroprudential regulation”. In the UK, this shift has resulted in the creation of the Financial Policy Committee, which has just published its thinking on the powers it wants and the tools it intends to use.

危机爆发之前,金融监管的重点是避免单个银行的破产,但在这一点上做得不尽如人意。如今,金融监管的重点更多地放在防范系统性危机上。用术语来说,我们已从注重“微观审慎监管”转向更加注重“宏观审慎监管”。在英国,这一转变催生了金融政策委员会(Financial Policy Committee),它刚刚公布了关于希望拥有何种权力和打算使用何种工具的想法。

您已阅读8%(673字),剩余92%(7348字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×