If the markets were truly Darwinian, would growth investors exist? They pay up for stocks with strong prospects. That is, they shell out for something that might materialise, in contrast to value investors, who pay less for assets that exist now. Looked at this way, there is a reason that growth investing does not have a hero such as Warren Buffett. It’s stupid.
如果市场确实按照达尔文理论进化，那成长型投资者还会存在吗？他们愿意出高价买下前景强劲的股票。也就是说，他们会出高价买进可能成为现实的东西，这与价值型投资者相反，后者以折扣价购买现实存在的资产。如此看来，成长型投资者中出不了像沃伦•巴菲特(Warren Buffett)这样的英雄是有原因的。这种方法很愚蠢。
您已阅读20%（517字），剩余80%（2014字）包含更多重要信息，订阅以继续探索完整内容，并享受更多专属服务。