薪酬

Leader_MEPs overstep

The European parliament has opened a new front in its battle against bonuses in the financial sector. Having capped the ratio of variable to fixed pay for bankers, it now wants to extend this clampdown to fund managers. It may only be time before the net is widened to hedge funds and other financial institutions.

Fund managers have often been criticised for charging high and murky fees. The incentive structure in their pay deals can be geared towards short-termism. But the maximum 1:1 cap that MEPs want to enforce is not the answer. It will simply lead the industry to circumvent the rules by offering higher fixed salaries, as is already happening with banks. Bonuses are a good way to link pay to performance in highly cyclical industries: lawmakers should ensure that they are awarded on the basis of transparent principles, rather than limiting their size.

It is also questionable whether MEPs have the right to regulate pay across the financial sector. They argue that applying the rules designed for bankers to fund managers creates a level playing field in the industry. Yet, banks are different. Voters have an interest in ensuring they are properly run, since governments are often on the hook when things go wrong. But the same argument about public good does not apply to most fund managers or hedge funds. Regulating their pay is over-reach.

您已阅读62%(1357字),剩余38%(821字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×