观点美国外交

Fighting talk amid the shrinking of American might
奥巴马外交政策自有其民意基础


《旗帜周刊》高级编辑考德威尔:在许多国际问题上,奥巴马宁愿背负优柔寡断的名声也不愿匆忙开战。无论美国人通常如何看待奥巴马,但他们颇为认同他在动用武力方面的退缩态度。

It looked like Barack Obama might do something rash when he travelled to West Point, New York, on Wednesday to deliver the commencement address of the US Military Academy. Foreign policy thinkers in both parties have accused the president of being unwilling to provide US leadership in the world. They urge him to look to his “legacy” and to think big. The New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman recommended the Ukraine crisis as a “legacy opportunity” and even suggested a series of activist steps.

巴拉克•奥巴马(Barack Obama)最近前往纽约西点军校(见上图),在毕业典礼上发表演讲,此举可能有些轻率。美国两党的外交政策智囊都指责奥巴马不愿意让美国在世界上发挥领导作用。他们敦促奥巴马留心自己卸任后的“遗产”,希望他高瞻远瞩。《纽约时报》(The New York Times)专栏作家托马斯•弗里德曼(Thomas Friedman)认为乌克兰危机是一个“打造遗产的机遇”,甚至提议美国应采取一系列积极举措。

您已阅读11%(712字),剩余89%(5886字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×