专栏香港

Hong Kong’s umbrella evolution

It is five months since Hong Kong’s Umbrella revolution folded up and called a halt to its occupation of the city centre. Although none of its demands for “real democracy” was met, the student-led movement was hardly a flop. Most who witnessed the protests were charmed by the idealism of young people in a city that is often dismissed as obsessed only by money.

Students showed they care about legitimate government too. They proved that demonstrations could be peaceful. Protesters cleared up litter and set up classrooms to show they were not neglecting their studies. Although the city’s government tried to portray the occupation as anarchic, the students demonstrated the opposite: that Hong Kong is a mature society with a civic-minded citizenry ready to participate in a genuine democracy.

As brave as the students were, predictably they turned out to be a resistible force. The immovable object was Beijing. China’s Communist party was never going to let a bunch of street protesters back it into a corner. From its point of view, that would set a ghastly precedent. So would the idea of a citizenry freely electing its own leaders.

您已阅读26%(1139字),剩余74%(3315字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

戴维•皮林

戴维•皮林(David Pilling)现为《金融时报》非洲事务主编。此前他是FT亚洲版主编。他的专栏涉及到商业、投资、政治和manbetx20客户端下载 方面的话题。皮林1990年加入FT。他曾经在伦敦、智利、阿根廷工作过。在成为亚洲版主编之前,他担任FT东京分社社长。

相关文章

相关话题

设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×