专栏慈善

Why orphanages are best left in fiction

Last week, the author JK Rowling was in New York on a two-pronged mission. The first part of her crusade was unsurprising: the movie based on her book Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them opens this month and she and lead actor Eddie Redmayne were in town to promote it.

The second part of Rowling’s sales mission had an unusual twist. Some years ago, the writer set up a charity, Lumos, to fight for the millions of children across the world living in orphanages. And while you might have thought she would be campaigning for funds for these institutions, that is not the case. Instead, Rowling believes that something has gone badly wrong with the way that well-meaning westerners do “charity” — and, in particular, give money to orphanages.

In recent years, aid money has flooded from the US and Europe into orphanages in places such as India, Brazil, Romania and Haiti, often following tragic events highlighted in the media. Rowling estimates, for example, that Americans have given $100m to Haitian orphanages alone since the country was hit by a series of natural disasters. This sounds worthy, and, of course, donations are made with the best of intentions but Rowling insists that they are doing more harm than good.

您已阅读28%(1226字),剩余72%(3215字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

吉莲•邰蒂

吉莲•邰蒂(Gillian Tett)担任英国《金融时报》的助理主编,负责manbetx app苹果 金融市场的报导。2009年3月,她荣获英国出版业年度记者。她1993年加入FT,曾经被派往前苏联和欧洲地区工作。1997年,她担任FT东京分社社长。2003年,她回到伦敦,成为Lex专栏的副主编。邰蒂在剑桥大学获得社会人文学博士学位。她会讲法语、俄语、日语和波斯语。

相关文章

相关话题

设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×