专栏英美

Why Trump’s US is worse off than Brexit Britain

Viewed medium term, which country is most damaged — Brexit Britain or Donald Trump’s US? Many people would currently name Britain. They expect the House of Commons to vote down the UK’s withdrawal agreement with the EU this autumn, triggering a chaotic “ no-deal Brexit”. That could cause shortfalls of food and medicine, and disrupt travel and trade. Conversely, the betting must be that Trump — whose disapproval rating is at a record 60 per cent — loses office in 2020.

Yet I suspect the UK’s prospects are better. The country’s chances of a deal with Brussels are much higher than commonly thought. Though even a smooth Brexit is a pointless act of self-harm, Britain will probably achieve it with only modest damage by 2020. By then, meanwhile, the US could easily have become ungovernable.

Forecasts of a no-deal Brexit rest on a false assumption: that the withdrawal agreement will include some version of Theresa May’s Chequers proposal to the EU. Broadly, Chequers would keep the UK in Europe’s single market for goods but not for services. Many Tory MPs crave a harder Brexit. If the withdrawal agreement contains Chequers, they would probably join Labour in voting it down, risking no deal.

您已阅读23%(1199字),剩余77%(4013字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

西蒙•库柏

西蒙•库柏(Simon Kuper)1994年加入英国《金融时报》,在1998年离开FT之前,他撰写一个每日更新的货币专栏。2002年,他作为体育专栏作家重新加入FT,一直至今。如今,他为FT周末版杂志撰写一个话题广泛的专栏。

相关文章

相关话题

设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×