专栏北约

Is the west’s increased defence spending even necessary?

Every day, Putin is depleting his army against a non-Nato country, burning his assets like a narcissist-run start-up

A French friend of mine was one of the last conscripts stationed in 1980s West Germany. Their only conflicts were with Germans or other western armies, typically over women. After one row, a French commander had to be dissuaded from sending a tank down the local high street to show his rival who was boss.

Something of that era will return as the west remilitarises. “We face the most serious security situation in decades,” Nato’s secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg told the alliance’s Madrid summit last week. He promised a nearly eightfold expansion in forces on high alert to 300,000, though some Nato members confided they had no idea where he’d got that number. Member countries are also hiking defence spending: 2 per cent of GDP “is increasingly considered a floor, not a ceiling”, he said. But wandering around the Madrid summit, I wondered: even given Vladimir Putin’s malevolence, do we need to militarise? Will we? And how would remilitarisation change our societies?

Do we need to? Russia’s military spending in 2021 hit $66bn, says the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. But even then, the US was spending $801bn a year, and other Nato members about $363bn. If half the US’s outlay had no relevance to Europe, then Nato would still be outspending Russia’s military by about 10 to one in the region, notes Dan Plesch of SOAS, University of London. If the US abandons Europe after 2024, other Nato states would outspend Russia more than sixfold.

您已阅读32%(1471字),剩余68%(3086字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

西蒙•库柏

西蒙•库柏(Simon Kuper)1994年加入英国《金融时报》,在1998年离开FT之前,他撰写一个每日更新的货币专栏。2002年,他作为体育专栏作家重新加入FT,一直至今。如今,他为FT周末版杂志撰写一个话题广泛的专栏。

相关文章

相关话题

设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×