专栏人工智能

Writers vs AI bots is more than a Hollywood drama

Screenwriters’ strike reflects wider job insecurity and fear of being usurped by technology

A confrontation broke out in Los Angeles this week as 11,500 writers for film and television went on strike. Screenwriters know all about confrontations: they are the second acts of three-act dramas, when the main characters face a crisis that only gets resolved at the end.

“You put them in the worst possible position they could ever possibly get into in their lives,” George Lucas, creator of the Star Wars films, once remarked of the second act. In this drama, writers have seen their pay erode in the streaming era, have lost the comfy conditions of broadcast television and fear their jobs will be taken by robots.

It is strange to find among a list of demands submitted to producers by the Writers Guild of America the call for only humans, not AI chatbots, to be allowed to “write or rewrite literary material”. Drawing attention to the fact that you think software could do some of your job is a bold gambit but screenwriters have vivid imaginations and reasons to be insecure.

您已阅读20%(984字),剩余80%(4013字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

约翰•加普

约翰·加普(John Gapper)是英国《金融时报》副主编、首席产业评论员。他的专栏每周四会出现在英国《金融时报》的评论版。加普从1987年开始就在英国《金融时报》工作,报导劳资关系、银行和媒体。他曾经写过一本书,叫做《闪闪发亮的骗局》(All That Glitters),讲的是巴林银行1995年倒闭的内幕。

相关文章

相关话题

设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×