观点乌克兰战争

The west would harm itself with rash seizures of frozen Russian assets
西方贸然没收俄罗斯资产会造成反噬

A watertight legal basis for confiscations is lacking because the US and its allies are not openly at war with Moscow
马尔德:西方没收俄罗斯主权资产缺乏充分的法律依据,若西方用非法措施回应莫斯科的犯罪行为,其信誉就会受损。

The writer is assistant professor of history at Cornell University and author of ‘The Economic Weapon: the rise of sanctions as a tool of modern war’The western campaign of economic pressure against Russia is broaching a new domain: sovereign asset seizure. By March 2022, the US and EU had frozen roughly $300bn in Russian central bank reserves to retaliate against Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. Now G7 countries are debating whether to confiscate this property.

本文作者是康奈尔大学(Cornell University)历史学助理教授,著有《manbetx20客户端下载 武器:制裁作为现代战争工具的兴起》(The Economic Weapon: the rise of sanctions as a tool of modern war)。

您已阅读10%(600字),剩余90%(5658字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×