观点语言

It’s time to retire the word ‘technology’

The word spans too much and clarifies too little

The writer is a systems engineer and the author of ‘Wicked Problems: How to Engineer a Better World’

For centuries, when people wanted to describe a technology they spoke of “inventions” or “the useful arts”. In early English usage, “technology” referred to a treatise on technical subjects, not the tools themselves. Its modern usage — which covers everything from toothpicks to Teslas, and TikTok to tomahawks — gained ground in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, as engineering aligned itself with scientific authority and institutional prestige.

The result is that “technology” has become a bloated umbrella, spanning too much and clarifying too little. Nor is it alone in this semantic stampede. Words like “innovation,” “smart” and “sustainability” have suffered similar dilution, sprayed across policy memos and pitch decks until their edges blur.

您已阅读23%(857字),剩余77%(2833字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×