FT商学院

Why I stopped making election forecasts
我为什么不再做选举预测

The shocks of recent times have shown the rational voter is a myth
近期的震荡表明,理性选民只是一个神话。

In 2016, I was one of the fools who thought people wouldn’t vote for Donald Trump. As I explained to readers before the Republican primaries, “The electorate generally just wants a leader who appears sane, which is why Republicans almost certainly won’t nominate Trump.” I was taking my lead from so-called experts. “If you want to know the future,” I wrote in May that year, “the best forecasters are betting markets . . . The Oddschecker website, which compares odds offered by different bookmakers, indicates a chance of just over one in four that Brits will opt for Brexit. The chances of Trump becoming American president or Marine Le Pen French president are judged a tad smaller.”

2016年,我是那些认为人们不会投票给唐纳德•特朗普(Donald Trump)的傻瓜之一。正如我在共和党初选前向读者解释的那样,“选民通常只想要一个看起来理智的领导人,这就是为什么共和党几乎肯定不会提名特朗普。”我听从了所谓专家的建议。“如果你想知道未来,”我在那年5月写道,“最好的预测者是博彩市场……Oddschecker网站比较了不同博彩公司提供的赔率,显示英国人选择退欧的机会略高于四分之一。特朗普成为美国总统或马琳•勒庞(Marine Le Pen)成为法国总统的机会被认为稍微小一些。”

您已阅读14%(937字),剩余86%(5850字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×