FT商学院

America owes its European allies a defence roadmap

Retaliatory cutbacks are no way to achieve proper burden-shifting in Nato

A US decision to withdraw 5,000 troops from Germany and cancel deployment of a special long-range strike battalion gives Europe yet another reason to rue its security dependency on a reckless Trump administration. The reduction in headcount, out of 80,000 US forces in Europe, is less important than the axing of a planned task force equipped with ground-launched Tomahawk cruise missiles and experimental hypersonic missiles. That move alone will leave a crucial capability gap just as Europe’s Nato members are gearing up to take more responsibility for their defence.

The manner of the announcement further weakens confidence in America’s commitment to the Atlantic alliance. It also suggests the Trump administration is not serious about coordinating a burden-shifting effort that spurs Europeans to take primary charge of their security while not leaving them more exposed to Russian attack.

Precision-targeted missiles and drones with a range of over 1,000km are an increasingly important offensive capability, as the wars in Ukraine and Iran have shown. An ability to destroy military facilities and defence production sites deep inside Russia rather than waiting to repel invading Russian forces would give Europe’s Nato members a powerful deterrent. It is vital that Europe acquires its own ground-launched missiles and drones and several development programmes are under way. But it will take at least five years to build up sufficient stocks.

您已阅读39%(1451字),剩余61%(2285字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×