观点联席首席执行官

More than two reasons to oppose dual heads
双头领导是把双刃剑


FT专栏作家希尔:仔细推敲之后,多数为双头管理辩护的传统理由都会不攻自破,但董事会仍会继续支持联席首席执行官制度。

I’ll say one thing for co-chief executives: two scapegoats are better than one. Since Research in Motion’s fortunes took a sharp turn for the worse last year, its dual-leadership structure has taken a beating. With the BlackBerry-maker’s decision last week to revert to one chief executive, the double-edged knives really came out for Jim Balsillie and Mike Lazaridis.

我要先为联席首席执行官(CEO)说句好话:两个替罪羊总比一个好。自从RIM公司(Research in Motion)的命运去年急转直下以来,该公司的双头领导(dual-leadership)结构受到了重创。最近,这家黑莓(BlackBerry)制造商决定,恢复单一CEO模式,这把双刃剑终于向吉姆•贝尔斯利(Jim Balsillie)和迈克•拉扎里迪斯(Mike Lazaridis)亮了出来。

您已阅读9%(567字),剩余91%(5674字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×