专栏美国大选

Obama is not to blame for anger in the Middle East

Turmoil in the Middle East looked like a gift to the presidential campaign of Mitt Romney. With unseemly eagerness, the Republican candidate unwrapped his present – blaming the Obama administration for encouraging Islamist militancy. Conservative commentators chimed in. On Fox Television, Charles Krauthammer announced: “What we are seeing on the screen is the meltdown, collapse of the Obama policy on the Muslim world.”

With an American ambassador dead and US embassies under assault, this is an easy accusation to make. But it is wrong. Rather than making things worse, the policies pursued by Barack Obama mean that the US is much better positioned to deal with the anti-American violence that has been a feature of politics in the Middle East for decades.

The conservative critique of Mr Obama relies heavily on selective amnesia. The argument seems to be that before his election, the US was strong and respected across the Middle East. But now a weak president has returned America to its enfeebled state under Jimmy Carter, when US diplomats were taken hostage in Iran. That humiliation, the Republicans well remember, contributed mightily to Mr Carter’s 1980 election defeat.

您已阅读22%(1183字),剩余78%(4157字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

吉迪恩•拉赫曼

吉迪恩•拉赫曼(Gideon Rachman)在英国《金融时报》主要负责撰写关于美国对外政策、欧盟事务、能源问题、manbetx20客户端下载 manbetx app苹果 化等方面的报道。他经常参与会议、学术和商业活动,并作为评论人活跃于电视及广播节目中。他曾担任《manbetx20客户端下载 学人》亚洲版主编。

相关文章

相关话题

设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×