破局与重塑

Why business will be reluctant to pay the price of supersonic flight

Companies will have to weigh time savings of flying faster than speed of sound against environmental impact

Here is a question for all you busy executives, deal makers and time-starved travellers. If you could save three hours flying from London to New York on a supersonic jet, but knew your journey would generate two to eight times the carbon of a flight on a conventional aircraft, would you do it?Two weeks ago, American Airlines put down an undisclosed deposit for 20 supersonic aircraft being developed by Colorado start-up Boom. Blake Scholl, Boom’s founder, believes there are enough of you out there to fill “hundreds if not thousands of these aeroplanes”. I am not so sure.

Twenty years ago, when Concorde was guzzling twice the fuel of a 747 jumbo to carry a quarter of the passengers, companies did not have to measure their carbon footprints. Today, they are under pressure from investors, regulators and customers to reduce the climate impact of doing business.

Even assuming that Boom overcomes the noise problem, supersonic travel will be one of the least green and most expensive options for air passengers.

您已阅读23%(1015字),剩余77%(3420字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×