观点奢侈品

Why luxury goods just isn’t a platform business

In a sector where only a few brands really matter, Farfetch’s path to profitability is not clear

In many walks of life, platform companies do very well. It is perfectly possible to create a digital space that connects large numbers of buyers and sellers, and make a decent cut out of each transaction. See Uber, which now has a market value of more than $126bn. Or Airbnb, worth about $87bn.

Compare and contrast such success stories with Farfetch. The platform once hoped to be the “Uber of luxury”. At one time it was worth $24bn. It fetched very little in the end. A $500mn deal at the end of the year, with Korean etailer Coupang and Greenoaks Capital Partner, wiped out the equity entirely.

Farfetch’s unravelling points to a fundamental problem in creating a platform for luxury goods. Unlike the fragmented universe of drivers, rental accommodation, beauty products or food delivery, there are not many luxury brands that really matter. 

您已阅读40%(845字),剩余60%(1246字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×