FT商学院

The AI Shift: should LLMs be allowed in the classroom?

Is the technology a dangerous crutch or a personal tutor?

This article is an on-site version of our The AI Shift newsletter. Premium subscribers can sign up here to get the newsletter delivered every Thursday. Standard subscribers can upgrade to Premium here, or explore all FT newsletters

Hello and welcome back to The AI Shift. This week: what’s the positive case for AI’s role in education? We have read (and also written) plenty this year about the danger that AI poses to young people’s ability to learn. So today we thought we’d take a more constructive approach. Are there any useful lessons from history? And what do we know so far about whether — and how — AI can be used to enhance the learning process? Email us: aishift@ft.com.

Sarah writes

I often meet academics who believe their students are leaning far too heavily on large language models for their essays or coding assignments. But a popular counter-argument compares this debate to one we’ve had before: about the pocket calculator. These new machines also prompted a “moral panic” about education in the 1970s, the argument goes. But young people do still acquire maths skills. In fact, they can now do more complex and better maths, thanks to the tools at their disposal.

您已阅读14%(1181字),剩余86%(7520字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×