专栏金融市场

Argument on price limits deserves special attention

Ever since the so-called “flash crash” on May 6, policymakers have fretted about the state of equity markets. So have investors. But is it possible this focus on equity markets is missing a trick? Could the flash crash reveal a problem that goes beyond high- frequency traders?

For Paul Tudor Jones, the hedge fund manager, the answer is yes. This week, he delivered a passionate speech to a CME conference in Florida that argued that the crucial problem bedevilling all markets these days was a lack of price limits, in effect, rules that stop trading when prices have moved too far. He implored regulators to impose these limits, not just for equities and futures (where some exchanges, such as the CME, already impose limits), but for all securities traded on exchanges, including options and derivatives. “I cannot tell you how many thousands of times I have traded on information that 24 hours later proved to be at least partially inaccurate or irrelevant,” he told the CME conference, adding that “relatively severe price limits” would force “all participants to take a more deliberate approach to external shocks that can only be accurately assessed with more time to gather information”.

It is a bold – if not contrarian – thing for a hedge fund veteran to say, particularly one who has earned billions by playing the (free-ish) markets. As Tudor Jones himself observed, most financial operators consider price limits to be anathema to modern free markets.

您已阅读32%(1463字),剩余68%(3122字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

吉莲•邰蒂

吉莲•邰蒂(Gillian Tett)担任英国《金融时报》的助理主编,负责manbetx app苹果 金融市场的报导。2009年3月,她荣获英国出版业年度记者。她1993年加入FT,曾经被派往前苏联和欧洲地区工作。1997年,她担任FT东京分社社长。2003年,她回到伦敦,成为Lex专栏的副主编。邰蒂在剑桥大学获得社会人文学博士学位。她会讲法语、俄语、日语和波斯语。

相关文章

相关话题

设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×